Let's let X1 and X2 be girls, and Y1 and Y2 be the respective girls' boyfriends. (that is, Y1 is X1's boyfriend, and Y2 is X2's boyfriend). Let's let E1 and E2 be male friends of the girls, and other variables/definitions will be defined as we come to them. Also, X1, X2, Y1, Y2, E1, and E2 have at least heard of each other. X1 and X2 are good friends, X1 and Y2 can at least be considered friends, X1 thinks E2 is a retard, Y1 and X2 are friends (I guess), Y1 and Y2 hate each other, E1 and Y2 are very close friends. Now, for the equations:
X1 + Y1 + E1 Relationship score of 5. This score would be higher, but Y1 doesn't particularly like E1, due to worries that E1 is trying to horn in on X1, as E1 and X1 spend a lot of time together without Y1. Both X1 and E1 know that Y1 has nothing to worry about, as X1 and E1 are simply just friends. X1 + Y1 relationship score reaches Level 10, engagement. For some reason, X2 is determined to convince Y2 that X1 + Y1 + E1 actually = lots of wild sex between X1 and E1. Due to Y2 and E1's solid friendship, Y2 never fully buys into this equation despite not being particularly fond of Y1, tho he does occasionally make comments about the possible (though neither probable nor provable) copious amounts of wild sex between X1 and E1 out of love and respect for the manipulative X2.
X2 + Y2 + E2 = Y2 is rather fond of E2 but is worried about E2, X2 proclaims intense lack of desire for E2, and Y2 grudgingly accepts this, tho remaining worried. Relationship score of X2 + Y2 begins to approach 0. Y2 tries to prevent score from reaching 0, but X2 makes a preemptive strike, and Y2 is unable to stop the relationship score from hitting the dreaded 0, breakup. Shortly thereafter, Y2's fears = confirmed, as we then have:
X2 + E2 = positive relationship score.
What happened to Y2 in the equation?
Please note all variables are just that: variables. They do not in any way, shape, or form purposely describe any real person, living or dead. Any similarities between any real persons, living or dead, is strictly coincidental. Ok, not really. Anybody read this ever? Anybody care to guess wtf this is talking about?
X1 + Y1 + E1 Relationship score of 5. This score would be higher, but Y1 doesn't particularly like E1, due to worries that E1 is trying to horn in on X1, as E1 and X1 spend a lot of time together without Y1. Both X1 and E1 know that Y1 has nothing to worry about, as X1 and E1 are simply just friends. X1 + Y1 relationship score reaches Level 10, engagement. For some reason, X2 is determined to convince Y2 that X1 + Y1 + E1 actually = lots of wild sex between X1 and E1. Due to Y2 and E1's solid friendship, Y2 never fully buys into this equation despite not being particularly fond of Y1, tho he does occasionally make comments about the possible (though neither probable nor provable) copious amounts of wild sex between X1 and E1 out of love and respect for the manipulative X2.
X2 + Y2 + E2 = Y2 is rather fond of E2 but is worried about E2, X2 proclaims intense lack of desire for E2, and Y2 grudgingly accepts this, tho remaining worried. Relationship score of X2 + Y2 begins to approach 0. Y2 tries to prevent score from reaching 0, but X2 makes a preemptive strike, and Y2 is unable to stop the relationship score from hitting the dreaded 0, breakup. Shortly thereafter, Y2's fears = confirmed, as we then have:
X2 + E2 = positive relationship score.
What happened to Y2 in the equation?
Please note all variables are just that: variables. They do not in any way, shape, or form purposely describe any real person, living or dead. Any similarities between any real persons, living or dead, is strictly coincidental. Ok, not really. Anybody read this ever? Anybody care to guess wtf this is talking about?
Current Mood:
exhausted

7 comments | Leave a comment